|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-abortion
Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPC's)
|
|
|
Specific Concerns: Lack of monitoring of
information disseminated in the classroom
|
|
| I also have great concern
about the lack of attention that individual school
administrators and teachers gave to the very important
responsibility of assuring the accuracy of the information
of an outside organization that teachers invite
into the classroom, especially an organization,
as I said earlier, that is controversial, deals
with such a controversial subject, and has an admitted
religious bias in what information they provide
to students and the accuracy of that information. |
|
| First, some teachers did
everything but listen to the presenter while others
listened with one ear while they worked on the computer
on their desks or graded papers. Some teachers came
in an out of the presentations and some teachers
were absent leaving their students with a substitute
teacher or student teacher, the former, I understand
from district officials, is not appropriate according
to district policy. |
|
| During the 2001 school
year, in my daughter's health class at Rocky Mountain
High School, the teacher, in my judgment, clearly
sympathetic to the Alpha Center, told me she had
previously reprimanded the Alpha Center for using
inaccurate information, telling them that until
they changed or removed the information they could
not present in her classroom. She told me that the
Alpha Center had referred to their not being allowed
to |
|
|
| present in her classroom
on that occasion as "black Tuesday." But then this
same teacher invited the Alpha Center back into
her classroom in the subsequent year, into my daughter's
health class, where she was absent during the Alpha
Center's presentation and a substitute or student
teacher, I am not sure which, was present. In this
presentation the Alpha Center did not disclose to
students what kind of organization they are or all
of the services they do not provide, though they
did place their phone number on the board telling
students they were a resource for them if they became
pregnant. The Alpha Center also said in that class,
"Condoms aren't meant to protect you from HIV
just pregnancy." |
|
| That outright false statement
the Alpha Center presenter made regarding the protection
condoms offer against HIV, was a statement the substitute/student
teacher never heard or he simply did not recognize
the information as being erroneous information.
That is dangerous and could prove deadly for our
children. In either case the Alpha Center was not
challenged nor was such erroneous information corrected,
on the spot, for the students, as it should have
been. While I could speak to my daughter at home
and correct that dangerous information, no other
parent of a child in that classroom was afforded
that opportunity. |
|
|
|
|
"I also have great concern about the lack
of attention that individual
school administrators and teachers gave to the very important
responsibility of assuring the accuracy of the information
of an outside organization that teachers invite into the classroom."
|
|
| It is also important to
note that this particular educator said she was
capable of looking out for her students' best interest
and would indeed be upfront with the Alpha Center
should they present inaccurate information in her
classrooms. Yet, in spite of her statement she left
my daughter's classroom without the close scrutiny
and oversight she said she was capable of providing
and which she agreed to give, even after admitting
that she had in the more recent past reprimanded
the Alpha Center for delivering inaccurate and erroneous
information to her students. And remember, she is
the educator who said she brings other speakers
into the classroom after the Alpha Center to present
"the other side" to students. |
|
| Moreover, this teacher
clearly resented my intervention on behalf of my
daughter and my review of what was transpiring in
her classroom as both a parent of a child in the
district and most likely as a representative of
Life and Liberty for Women.
In fact in this last school year as I began requesting
of teachers who were going to utilize the Alpha
Center again, this teacher among them, to observe
their presentations, this teacher was adamant that
she would physically bar me from her classroom if
I tried to enter. Consequently, either a district
official or her vice-principal or neither was present
in the spring when the Alpha Center presented in
her classroom. |
|
|
| In my many observations
at both the junior and high school level in the
2002-2003 school year, I found that sentiment is
apparently shared by other school administrators
and teachers, at least in practice, because some
invited the Alpha Center to present their abstinence-only
till marriage curriculum and then supplemented information
about STDs/HIV/AIDS, condoms, and contraceptives
with other organizations like Colorado State University
Health Services or NCAP - Northern Colorado AIDS
Project. One junior high instructor told me, in
a nutshell; that NCAP's presentation on HIV/AIDS
and STDS was more the way such information should
be presented and was more accurate. |
|
| Moreover, it is important
to understand that a forum for competing ideas is
a debate format or a panel discussion format in
which two competing ideas can be simultaneously
presented, heard, and compared and contrasted by
students. Such a forum is reserved for and best
used for topics in which debate is appropriate.
For example, should sex education be taught in public
schools? Should the sex education program be an
abstinence-based comprehensive one or an abstinence-only
till marriage program? Should condoms be distributed
on high school campuses? |
|
|
|
|
"During the 2001 school year, in my daughter's
health class
at Rocky Mountain High School.The Alpha Center said,
'Condoms aren't meant to protect you from HIV just pregnancy."
|
|
| A forum in which competing
ideas and philosophies or methods are offered is
not an appropriate forum for the delivery of a sex
education program. There is no such thing as a competition
of ideas when it involves mainstream well proven,
documented and accepted scientifically based information
such as the pregnancy and disease prevention qualities
of consistently and correctly used condoms. |
|
| An educator viewing an
abstinence-based comprehensive curriculum and an
abstinence-only till marriage curriculum as merely
"competing views" that can be presented in any other
forum other than a debate or panel discussion forum
is doing the wrong thing for his/her students. |
|
| And it is clear that parents
have no idea about exactly what is being presented
or what forum it is being presented in, including
that their student is receiving "two competing views"
about avoiding and preventing a life-altering unintended
pregnancy, a sexually transmitted disease, or HIV/AIDS,
which leads to certain death. That is very problematic
and troubling and I am sure would concern every
parent who was made aware of such, regardless of
|
|
|
| whether they are abstinence-only
till marriage supporters or supporters of an abstinence-based
comprehensive sex education program. |
|
| Thirdly, teachers who
are sympathetic to the Alpha Center, would not challenge
erroneous information because they would not believe
it to be erroneous while many, if not most other
teachers, who may not be trained sex educators or
more likely, aware of the role the organization's
religious and philosophical bias plays in their
presentations, will trust the organization to present
scientifically accurate information. Inaccurate
information presented as a result of the Alpha Center's
religious beliefs may end up going unnoticed and
unchallenged. |
|
| It is equally important
for school principals and vice-principals to be
fully aware of the outside organizations and speakers
their teachers are bringing into the classroom,
most particularly when these groups or speakers
are dealing with such sensitive information as is
involved in sex education programs. I am confident
they realize there comes with such individual school
oversight, a very serious responsibility to ensure
the accuracy of the information presented in their
school's classrooms. |
|
|
|
|
"I think too that it is important to be
aware that any changes in the way the Alpha Center conducted
their presentations or any change to the information they
relayed in the classroom that Poudre School District demanded
in 2001, hasn't changed any philosophical or religious beliefs
they hold.or that any such demands by the district has changed
their primary purpose for existence."
|
|
| While Rocky Mountain
High School had a vice-principal that observed at
least one Alpha Center presentation, I am not clear
that he, also not a trained sex educator, was aware
of the particulars of the Alpha Center's religious
bias and agenda and how that bias colored what they
presented, such as the information on condoms the
Alpha Center presented in 2001 to my daughter's
health class. Unless an administrator sits in the
classroom in the first place, and as with teachers,
know what to listen for and actively listens for
both accuracy of the sex education information presented
and information presented that goes to the organization's
religious bias in the second place, they cannot
render proper oversight to the accuracy of information
district students are being presented with from
this outside group. |
|
| |
|
|
| Finally, I think too that
it is important to be aware that any changes in
the way the Alpha Center conducted their presentations
or any change to the information they relayed in
the classroom that Poudre School District demanded
in 2001, has not changed any philosophical or religious
beliefs they hold regarding abstinence, contraceptives
and condoms, or that any such demands by the district
has changed their primary purpose for existence,
that is to bring in to their center as many abortion-minded
or abortion-vulnerable women and teenage girls as
they can so they may persuade them not to have an
abortion. That fact makes it questionable, or should
for parents, community members, school district
board members, school district officials, and district
educators, that the Alpha Center, which has and
still is presenting inaccurate information, could
be trusted in the classroom without constant oversight
from individuals familiar with their philosophical
and religious beliefs and agenda. |
|
|
|
| I do not believe it is
wise for Poudre School District to involve itself
with a community organization in the manner it has
involved itself with the Alpha Center, when such
an organization has proven itself time and again
to be so very untrustworthy. Nor is it wise for
the district to involve itself with an organization
which disseminates sex education information that
is colored by a religious bias and goals and a philosophical
belief that is diametrically opposed to the district's
goals and philosophical belief made clear in their
comprehensive health education policy. |
|
|
| OBSERVATION: It
was clear that while Alpha Center volunteers had
a notebook of information in front of them from
which to refer, and while some material was common
in all the presentations I observed, they clearly
had broad discretion about what information they
personally wanted to deliver and how they would
deliver it, what "games" they wanted to expose students
to, and the introduction of statements or material
clearly biased toward personal beliefs and the organization's
religious beliefs and political agenda. I am concerned
that the lack of consistency in their presentations
from one classroom to another is confusing for students,
not productive toward promoting abstinence and is
highly detrimental to students. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|